Hello @Princess - thank you for the above proposal.
It looks like you’ve addressed the feedback from the Committee on your earlier proposals except for the recordings access point we were discussing in your previous application thread. Please make a point of specifying in the above post when and how you plan to allow for user access to the full recordings library (and not just their own). This part seems key to your core purpose of this project, by enabling users the ability to [store]:
that data securely and decentralized, giving researchers, developers, and communities access to ethically sourced language data.
And I recognize you acknowledge the need for explicit user consent for this portion in the Mitigations section but the implementation is just not clear.
With this edit completed by September 10, the proposal will be reviewed at the next Grants Committee Meeting on September 16.
Note: I’ve edited your proposal to reflect a new terminology change we’re implementing where we are asking everyone to refer to their developer work as “dev/developer fees” instead of “salary.”