Hi @Yucky-dev - thank you for these changes. Have you given any further thought to revising your proposal to have closer thematic alignment with our new guidelines (as pointed out by pcfreak above)?
Technically your proposal would count as part of ‘Building on indexd’ (although there is repeat mention of ‘renterd’ instead of ‘indexd’ which confuses matters), but the value and potential impact of the use case listed (s3d + indexd) is not clear enough here for me to pass this to the Committee for review.
Please re-evaluate and indicate if/when this proposal is ready for another review.